Human Coherence
An Interdisciplinary Framework for Understanding Perception, Meaning, Judgment, and Human Systems
The overarching research framework investigating how individuals, institutions, and cultures establish, maintain, and restore coherence under conditions of complexity and change.
FRAMEWORK STATUS
Human Coherence is an evolving interdisciplinary research framework developed by Greg C. Dansereau. This page serves as the canonical reference for the framework and is updated as ongoing scholarly research, documentary field inquiry, and published work continue to refine its concepts and applications.
The framework integrates perspectives from leadership studies, systems thinking, cognitive psychology, organizational behavior, archaeology, mythology, knowledge translation, and contemplative traditions. Across these domains, it asks a common question:
How do humans remain in legitimate relationship with reality, with one another, and with the systems they inhabit under conditions of complexity and change?
Human Coherence serves as the overarching framework for the broader research program.
Its related frameworks investigate specific dimensions of coherence:
Nine Pillars — developmental coherence
Perceptual Intelligence — perceptual coherence
Architecture of Consciousness — experiential coherence
Justice Architecture — institutional coherence
Sacred Pedagogy — educational coherence
Central Research Question:
How do individuals, institutions, and cultures establish, maintain, and restore coherent relationships among perception, meaning, judgment, and action under conditions of complexity and change?
Organizing Model
Human beings continuously transform experience into action through a series of interconnected processes:
Observation
↓
Perception
↓
Interpretation
↓
Meaning
↓
Judgment
↓
Decision
↓
Action
↓
Feedback
↓
Adaptation
Coherence is strengthened when these processes remain structurally aligned.
Coherence degrades when perception becomes distorted, interpretation becomes rigid, institutional structures lose legitimacy, or feedback loops become disconnected from lived reality.
DOMAINS OF INQUIRY
The framework investigates coherence across multiple scales simultaneously.
-
Identity
Attention
Emotional regulation
Perception
Decision-making
Purpose
-
Communication
Trust
Conflict
Boundaries
Leadership
Shared meaning
-
Governance
Justice
Education
Operational systems
Knowledge translation
Professional judgment
-
Myth
Symbol
Collective memory
Tradition
Ritual
Narrative
-
Landscape
Place
Seasonality
Human-environment relationships
Adaptive systems
Related Frameworks
Human Coherence is expressed through several interconnected research programs.
Nine Pillars
An observational framework identifying recurring developmental dimensions across cultures and human experience.
Perceptual Intelligence
The disciplined capacity to accurately perceive, interpret, and respond to information while distinguishing direct observation from projection and narrative construction.
Justice Architecture
An investigation into how legitimacy, discretion, accountability, and institutional trust are structurally organized.
Architecture of Consciousness
A framework examining how perception, identity, memory, attention, and meaning organize conscious experience.
Sacred Pedagogy
An educational framework exploring transformational learning, knowledge translation, and developmental inquiry.
Framework Applications
Current areas of investigation include:
Leadership under uncertainty
Operational decision-making
Institutional legitimacy
Knowledge translation
Documentary inquiry
Archaeological interpretation
Cross-cultural meaning systems
Identity transitions
Professional judgment
Human development
Methodological Approach
Rather than beginning with discipline-specific assumptions, Human Coherence adopts an interdisciplinary strategy.
Evidence may include:
Field observation
Documentary research
Historical analysis
Comparative mythology
Leadership practice
Operational systems
Reflective inquiry
Participatory learning
Knowledge translation
The objective is not to collapse these perspectives into a single explanation, but to identify recurring structural relationships that remain observable across contexts.
Framework Development
Human Coherence represents an evolving research program rather than a completed theory.
Working papers, documentary field studies, journal essays, and applied practice continue to refine the framework through ongoing interdisciplinary inquiry.
Related Frameworks
About the Research Program
Greg C. Dansereau is an interdisciplinary researcher whose work explores leadership, governance, perception, documentary inquiry, and human development through the study of recurring structural patterns. Human Coherence serves as the organizing framework connecting these research streams into a unified body of inquiry.
Why This Matters
Across psychology, education, leadership, governance, organizational studies, archaeology, anthropology, and systems science, researchers investigate different aspects of human experience. Human Coherence proposes that these diverse perspectives share common structural relationships governing how information becomes perception, how perception becomes judgment, and how judgment becomes action.
Rather than replacing existing disciplines, the framework seeks to provide an integrative language through which recurring patterns can be recognized across contexts.
Understanding these relationships may improve leadership, institutional design, education, professional judgment, knowledge translation, and human development while strengthening the capacity of individuals and organizations to remain coherent under conditions of uncertainty.